Resolving Quantity- and Informativeness-Implicature in Indefinite Reference
نویسندگان
چکیده
A central challenge for all theories of conversational implicature (Grice, 1957, 1975) is characterizing the fundamental tension between Quantity (Q) implicature, in which utterance meaning is refined through exclusion of the meanings of alternative utterances, and Informativeness (I ) implicature, in which utterance meaning is refined by strengthening to the prototypical case (Atlas & Levinson, 1981; Levinson, 2000). Here we report a large-scale experimental investigation of Q-I resolution in cases of semantically underspecified indefinite reference. We found strong support for five predictions, strengthening the case for recent rational speaker models of conversational implicature (Frank & Goodman, 2012; Degen, Franke, & Jäger, 2013): interpretational preferences were a↵ected by (i) subjective prior probabilities (Informativeness), (ii) the polarity and (iii) the magnitude of utterance cost di↵erentials (Quantity), (iv) the felicity conditions of indefinite NPs in English, and (v) the ‘relatability’ of X and Y.
منابع مشابه
SQUINKY! A Corpus of Sentence-level Formality, Informativeness, and Implicature
We introduce a corpus of 7,032 sentences rated by human annotators for formality, informativeness, and implicature on a 1-7 scale. The corpus was annotated using Amazon Mechanical Turk.1 Reliability in the obtained judgments was examined by comparing mean ratings across two MTurk experiments, and correlation with pilot annotations (on sentence formality) conducted in a more controlled setting. ...
متن کاملPragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature
Recent investigations of the acquisition of scalar implicature report that young children do not reliably reject a sentence with a weak scalar term, e.g. 'some of the books are red', when it is used as a description of a situation where a stronger statement is true, e.g. where all the books are red. This is taken as evidence that children do not interpret the sentence with the implicature that ...
متن کاملReasoning about definiteness in a language without articles ∗
Most theories of implicature make reference to a notion of alternatives. Interlocutors reason about what the speaker could have said. In this paper, I investigate the structure of these alternatives. In particular, I ask how these alternative utterances are constrained by the interlocutors’ grammar. I argue that in order to derive certain implicatures, alternative utterances must be analyzed li...
متن کاملAd-hoc scalar implicature in adults and children
Linguistic communication relies on pragmatic implicatures such as the inference that if “some students passed the test,” not all did. Yet young children perform poorly on tests of implicature, especially scalar implicatures using “some” and “all,” until quite late in development. We investigate the origins of scalar implicature using tasks in which the scale arises from real-world context rathe...
متن کاملProbabilistic integration of linguistic framing in ad-hoc pragmatic implicatures
Language comprehenders make a wide variety of pragmatic inferences to determine the meaning of ambiguous utterances in context. These inferences are affected by both the informativeness of the alternative messages with respect to an interpretation and the relevance of potential interpretations within the context (Grice, 1975). We use simple referential games to explore the interaction of these ...
متن کامل